Idealism Wins Hearts, Not Elections

ХудожникХудожникListening to the Republican debates, I find myself agreeing time and time again with the answers provided by Ron Paul. But as I think through the issues, I am bogged down by the realization that no matter how “right” Ron Paul may be, he’s still just one person, and most federal decisions are not made by a single man or woman.

Published by

Daniel Dessinger

Daniel is an avid people watcher and writer who shares regularly on his self-awareness site, DanielDessinger.com. Founder of CultureFeast.com in 2005. Co-Founder of Mommypotamus.com in 2009. He's on a mission to challenge the questions we ask and the assumptions we make.

One thought on “Idealism Wins Hearts, Not Elections”

  1. He definitely wouldn’t compromise… his track record proves that. He doesn’t flip-flop like the others.

    Even if one person can’t change everything on their own, we have to stand for liberty anyway. And vote. At least we still have that right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *